![]() Economics and the level of erosion control among the tillage practices compared here, rather than yield alone, should guide farmer preferences. Our results suggest that many farmers’ concerns about using conservation tillage practices do not necessarily translate into yield losses when compared to standard chisel plow practices. ![]() Among 19 soil properties, only fungal/bacteria ratios differed among strip-till with shanks (0.078) and strip-till with coulters (0.066) at one site. Tillage effects within a site were few and mixed (0.17–0.36 Mg ha −1 difference), whereas site effects were common (0.50–3.00 Mg ha −1 difference). Tillage systems (chisel plow, fall strip-till with shanks, spring strip-till with coulters, and shallow vertical till) were continued for 4 yr. The purpose of this study was to determine how four production-scale tillage systems affected residue cover, stand populations, crop yields, and soil chemical, biological, and physical properties. In the US upper Midwest, the narrow growing season causes many farmers to presume yield losses when reducing tillage. Farmers’ presumed yield losses among tillage systems did not reflect actual yields.Tillage affected only fungi/bacteria ratios out of 19 soil properties.Strip till had the least costs per hectare and may be more economical for farmers.Production-scale conservation tillage systems had few effects on crop yields.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |